Comments for Newton Excel Bach, not (just) an Excel Blog http://newtonexcelbach.wordpress.com An Excel blog for engineers and scientists, and an engineering and science blog for Excel users. Mon, 09 Nov 2009 10:44:58 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 Comment on Chart Trend Lines and the Linest Function by Excel Training Courses http://newtonexcelbach.wordpress.com/2009/11/03/chart-trend-lines-and-the-linest-function/#comment-673 Excel Training Courses Mon, 09 Nov 2009 10:44:58 +0000 http://newtonexcelbach.wordpress.com/?p=1218#comment-673 These graphs have lots of usage in business case preparations! These graphs have lots of usage in business case preparations!

]]> Comment on Linking Excel to Fortran – 2 by dougaj4 http://newtonexcelbach.wordpress.com/2008/12/04/linking-excel-to-fortran-2/#comment-670 dougaj4 Mon, 02 Nov 2009 21:18:06 +0000 http://newtonexcelbach.wordpress.com/?p=486#comment-670 R. Mitchell - It does work in Excel 2007. Did you read the previous posts?: http://newtonexcelbach.wordpress.com/2008/11/24/silverfrost-personal-fortran/ http://newtonexcelbach.wordpress.com/2008/12/01/linking-excel-to-fortran/ If you read those and it still doesn't work for you please post exactly what the problem is and I'll see if I can help. R. Mitchell – It does work in Excel 2007. Did you read the previous posts?:

http://newtonexcelbach.wordpress.com/2008/11/24/silverfrost-personal-fortran/

http://newtonexcelbach.wordpress.com/2008/12/01/linking-excel-to-fortran/

If you read those and it still doesn’t work for you please post exactly what the problem is and I’ll see if I can help.

]]> Comment on Linking Excel to Fortran – 2 by R. Mitchell http://newtonexcelbach.wordpress.com/2008/12/04/linking-excel-to-fortran-2/#comment-669 R. Mitchell Mon, 02 Nov 2009 17:01:47 +0000 http://newtonexcelbach.wordpress.com/?p=486#comment-669 The procedure does'nt work in excel 2007 The procedure does’nt work in excel 2007

]]> Comment on The Dome of the Pantheon by dougaj4 http://newtonexcelbach.wordpress.com/2008/05/24/the-dome-of-the-pantheon/#comment-668 dougaj4 Sat, 31 Oct 2009 23:59:20 +0000 http://newtonexcelbach.wordpress.com/?p=62#comment-668 Mike - sounds like you have difficult trivia quizzes :) Mike – sounds like you have difficult trivia quizzes :)

]]> Comment on The Dome of the Pantheon by Mike http://newtonexcelbach.wordpress.com/2008/05/24/the-dome-of-the-pantheon/#comment-667 Mike Sat, 31 Oct 2009 21:07:37 +0000 http://newtonexcelbach.wordpress.com/?p=62#comment-667 Great article. I will use this as a trivia question for my students. Great article. I will use this as a trivia question for my students.

]]> Comment on Importing text files with VBA – 3 by ROHIT http://newtonexcelbach.wordpress.com/2008/06/27/importing-text-files-with-vba-3/#comment-664 ROHIT Sat, 31 Oct 2009 06:38:36 +0000 http://newtonexcelbach.wordpress.com/?p=113#comment-664 HOW TO AUTO REFRESH OR AUTO IMPORT THE TEXT FILE ONCE ADDRESS OR PATH IS GIVEN IN 5 SECONDS OR 10. IF TEXT FILE IS AUTO CHANGING THEN EXCEL WHICH IMPORTING SHOULD ALSO CHANGE ITS TEXT WHICH IT IMPORT SO PLZ GIVE ME ITS SAMPLE FILE HOW TO AUTO REFRESH OR AUTO IMPORT THE TEXT FILE ONCE ADDRESS OR PATH IS GIVEN IN 5 SECONDS OR 10. IF TEXT FILE IS AUTO CHANGING THEN EXCEL WHICH IMPORTING SHOULD ALSO CHANGE ITS TEXT WHICH IT IMPORT SO PLZ GIVE ME ITS SAMPLE FILE

]]> Comment on Reinforced Concrete Section Analysis – 3 by ghan9981 http://newtonexcelbach.wordpress.com/2008/05/30/reinforced-concrete-section-analysis-3/#comment-662 ghan9981 Mon, 26 Oct 2009 18:26:10 +0000 http://newtonexcelbach.wordpress.com/?p=63#comment-662 please mail me please mail me

]]> Comment on Reinforced Concrete Section Analysis – 3 by Reinforced Concrete Section Analysis – with prestress « Newton Excel Bach, not (just) an Excel Blog http://newtonexcelbach.wordpress.com/2008/05/30/reinforced-concrete-section-analysis-3/#comment-661 Reinforced Concrete Section Analysis – with prestress « Newton Excel Bach, not (just) an Excel Blog Sun, 25 Oct 2009 23:56:26 +0000 http://newtonexcelbach.wordpress.com/?p=63#comment-661 [...] Note that this spreadsheet is intended for the analysis of rectangular beams or slabs with two layers of reinforcement.  For more complex sections refer to Reinforced Concrete Section Analysis – 5; Ultimate Limit State and Reinforced Concrete Section Analysis – 3. [...] [...] Note that this spreadsheet is intended for the analysis of rectangular beams or slabs with two layers of reinforcement.  For more complex sections refer to Reinforced Concrete Section Analysis – 5; Ultimate Limit State and Reinforced Concrete Section Analysis – 3. [...]

]]> Comment on Reinforced Concrete Section Analysis – 5; Ultimate Limit State by Reinforced Concrete Section Analysis – with prestress « Newton Excel Bach, not (just) an Excel Blog http://newtonexcelbach.wordpress.com/2008/08/19/reinforced-concrete-section-analysis-5-ultimate-limit-state/#comment-660 Reinforced Concrete Section Analysis – with prestress « Newton Excel Bach, not (just) an Excel Blog Sun, 25 Oct 2009 23:52:10 +0000 http://newtonexcelbach.wordpress.com/?p=280#comment-660 [...] rectangular beams or slabs with two layers of reinforcement.  For more complex sections refer to Reinforced Concrete Section Analysis – 5; Ultimate Limit State and Reinforced Concrete Section Analysis [...] [...] rectangular beams or slabs with two layers of reinforcement.  For more complex sections refer to Reinforced Concrete Section Analysis – 5; Ultimate Limit State and Reinforced Concrete Section Analysis [...]

]]> Comment on Three UDFs by geoffness http://newtonexcelbach.wordpress.com/2009/10/05/three-udfs/#comment-659 geoffness Sun, 25 Oct 2009 22:01:53 +0000 http://newtonexcelbach.wordpress.com/?p=1177#comment-659 I think UDFs are as a rule the best solution for anything which is going to be used often enough to make them worthwhile. I usually find complicated logic easier to parse in code than in a worksheet function with nested calls. The one thing I think it's important to note with UDFs is that dependencies need to be managed carefully, so that the UDF is always recalculated when it needs to be. I think UDFs are as a rule the best solution for anything which is going to be used often enough to make them worthwhile. I usually find complicated logic easier to parse in code than in a worksheet function with nested calls. The one thing I think it’s important to note with UDFs is that dependencies need to be managed carefully, so that the UDF is always recalculated when it needs to be.

]]>